FrontDiscussionsChatRulesFAQLoginRegister
General Discussion / Solve the pollution problem
AuthorMessage
Mister101
July 5, 2010 - 2:33:02pm1 of 5
 Login
The only way to solve the world's pollution problem is through the use of nuclear power. Don't listen to the oil executives, they want you to use their product. Bio-renewable, tidal power, wind power, and solar power are too expensive to supply the world with energy. If this energy production method is improved upon, even better.

Americans used 126.1805 billion gallons of gasoline in 2009, according to the following website (when you multiply the gallons used per day by 365): http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123957686061311925.html. That's 504.722 million tons, and used 1.0004 billion tons of coal in 2009 according to this website: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/page/special/feature.html. That's a combined 1.5 trillion pounds of carbon just for the US.

The polar ice caps will melt, and probably much sooner then the IPCC estimate of the end of the 21st century (Al Gore says just a few years, but he's probably wrong). Ninety years is a short-time to replace all current pollution-generating energy production, yet no steps are being taken.

World coal consumption was 6.7 billion tons in 2006 by the way. The rest of the modern world is building coal power plants very quickly though, especially Indian and China. In the next decade, China will be building 500 coal power plants and 8 nuclear power plants.
cmdrmonkey
July 5, 2010 - 3:11:26pm2 of 5
 Login
This doesn't matter. WW3 starts next month. Use all the gas you want and have your beans and beef jerky ready.
chi
July 5, 2010 - 5:15:29pm3 of 5
To: Mister101Login
I can't wait until I buy my very first uranium reactor powered car.
alterego
July 5, 2010 - 5:16:49pm4 of 5
 Login
Natural gas + nuclear power as the bridge to cheaper/efficient renewables in the second half of the 21st century would make sense. The U.S. has gigantic natural gas reserves compared to it's oil reserves, and converting gas engines to natural gas isn't really that difficult. Who knows why this has never been a priority with all the talk of "energy independence"...
Mister101
July 5, 2010 - 6:11:11pm (edit: 7/5/10 - 6:12pm)5 of 5
To: alteregoLogin
Energy derived from natural gas has been the most rapidly increasing sector of total US energy. It would be less economical for cars to run on gas, since they require more energy then gas could provide. However gas still causes pollution, just not as much as oil or coal.
View Printable
General Discussion / Solve the pollution problem
Related Threads
ThreadAuthorRepliesViews
 Worthless cunt drowns puppies, laughs about itcmdrmonkey33570
 Lindsay Lohankhaid12815701
 Chat Roomchairmansteve10793158138
 China's massive traffic jam could last for weeksEncryptedmind11166
 4 year old finds used condom...LicenseToKill13244
 Blockbuster Bankruptcmdrmonkey9142
 PCvsConsole Facebook Groupziggy581090
 Woman Dumps Cat in GarbageEncryptedmind20369
 Darwin Was Wrong and Humanity Is Screwedandrewc513477
 PVCF: Twitter DirectoryOG1024318
 The FaceBook ROCKs!!!rogueee11485
 60-Foot-Wide Sinkhole in Guatemala 2010Encryptedmind20323
 Music Video DepositoryOG10612032
 The Uchiha Clan [Naruto]Pichu36712372
FrontDiscussionsVisionArchiveHankPVC
© pcvsconsole.com